Percorrer por autor "Oganisjana, Karine"
A mostrar 1 - 10 de 10
Resultados por página
Opções de ordenação
- Connecting with democracy: a pedagogical framework for education for democracyPublication . Jääskeläinen, Pauliina; Lantela, Pilvikki; Meriläinen, Susan; Vola, Joonas; Wallenius-Korkalo, Sandra; Aladrović Slovaček, Katarina; Pažur, Monika; Dilara Cazgir, Kardelen; Clara Pinzger, Veronika; Spahn, Lea; Maria Weber, Susanne; Dumins, Uldis; Oganisjana, Karine; Abelha, Marta; Almeida, Ana Patrícia; Abrantes, Pedro; Neves, Claudia; Oliveira, Juliana Gazzinelli de; Barber, Jo; Culshaw, Suzanne; Dickerson, Claire; Mpamhanga, Karen; Mulberry, Philippa; Toseland, Marie; Woods, Philip
- Data analysis reports. Deliverable 4.4Publication . Pažur, Monika; Slovaček, Katarina Aladrović; Domović, Vlatka; Drvodelić, Maja; Jurinović, Maša Rimac; Jääskeläinen, Pauliina; Wallenius-Korkalo, Sandra; Meriläinen, Susan; Cazgir, Kardelen Dilara; Pinzger, Vero; Weber, Susanne Maria; Spahn, Lea; Oganisjana, Karine; Neves, Cláudia; Oliveira, Juliana Gazzinelli de; Almeida, Ana Patrícia; Abelha, Marta; Abrantes, PedroThis deliverable contains the completed case studies of the 19 cases outlined in the AECED project proposal. These case research reports were handed in separately for each case study by each country. Case study reports include the following sections: 1) Case Description: a descriptive overview of participants, location, purpose - relevance to democracy-as-becoming, research activities and methods, researchers, and timeframe. 2) Brief Explanation of the Data Analysis: a concise ground before presenting research findings, including data types and sources, research methodologies and methods, and theoretical background. 3) Research Findings: the key outcomes and findings related to the AECED Project common research questions (RQ1-4). 4) Limitations: reflection on research methods and methodological limitations. 5) Relevance of context: reflection on how context-specific factors influenced the findings, and how contextual elements shaped participants' engagement and interpretation of the Framework and Guides. 6) Learnings for the Pedagogical Framework and Guides: evidence-based outcomes and key findings for improving the Pedagogical Framework and Guides with reflection on three dimensions of transformation, referencing the AECED Project methodological framework. 7) Ethical reflection and Gender dimension: reflection on the ethics and gender dimension in research and data analysis. The references for each country's case research are compiled into a single reference list at the end of the country reports.
- Developing democratic engagements and transformation in adult, professional and organisational learning: a practice companion for inspiring your facilitation and change-makingPublication . Weber, Susanne Maria; Spahn, Lea; Pinzger, Veronika Clara; Mpamhanga, Karen; Petzold, Julia; Jääskeläinen, Pauliina; Oganisjana, Karine; Abelha, Marta; Abrantes, Pedro; Almeida, Ana Patrícia; Barber, Joanne; Cazgir, Kardelen Dilara; Culshaw, Suzanne; Dickerson, Claire; Meriläinen, Susan; Netter, Dirk; Neves, Claudia; Oliveira, Juliana Gazzinelli de; Toseland, Marie; Vola, Joonas; Wallenius-Korkalo, Sandra; Wolter, Helena; Woods, Philip A.; Yalvac, Canan; Weber, Susanne Maria
- Guide for aesthetic and embodied learning for democracy in the field of adult, professional and organisational learningPublication . Spahn, Lea; Weber, Susanne Maria; Mpamhanga, Karen; Jääskeläinen, Pauliina; Neves, Claudia; Oganisjana, Karine; Abelha, Marta; Abrantes, Pedro; Almeida, Ana Patrícia; Barber, Joanne; Cazgir, Kardelen Dilara; Culshaw, Suzanne; Dickerson, Claire; Meriläinen, Susan; Netter, Dirk; Oliveira, Juliana Gazzinelli de; Ozols, Rolands; Pinzger, Veronika Clara; Toseland, Marie; Vola, Joonas; Wallenius-Korkalo, Sandra; Wolter, Helena; Woods, Philip A.
- Prototype framework, including its rationale, development and features – in English language and partner country language versions. Deliverable 3.1Publication . Neves, Claudia; Abelha, Marta; Almeida, Ana Patrícia; Abrantes, Pedro; Jääskeläinen, Pauliina; Culshaw, Suzanne; Cazgir, Kardelen; Oganisjana, Karine; Ozols, Roland; Pažur, Monika; Petzold, Julia; Smith, Karen; Spahn, Lea; Weber, Susanne ; Woods, Philip
- Prototype guides – in English language and partner country language versions. Deliverable D3.2Publication . Neves, Claudia; Abelha, Marta; Almeida, Ana Patrícia; Abrantes, Pedro; Jääskeläinen, Pauliina; Culshaw, Suzanne; Cazgir, Kardelen; Oganisjana, Karine; Ozols, Roland; Pažur, Monika; Petzold, Julia; Spahn, Lea; Weber, Susanne ; Aladrović, Katarina; Smith, Karen; Woods, Philip
- Report case(s) Design. Report, by each partner, of their case(s) design (including ethics permission) and how it contributes to the total projectPublication . Pažur, Monika; Jääskeläinen, Pauliina; Petzold, Julia; Cazgir, Kardelen; Spahn, Lea; Weber, Susanne; Kozlovskis, Konstantins; Oganisjana, Karine; Lace, Natalja; Ozols, Rolands; Neves, Claudia; Almeida, Ana Patrícia; Abelha, Marta; Oliveira, Juliana Gazzinelli de; Abrantes, Pedro; Woods, Philip; Mpamhanga, Karen; Culshaw, Suzanne; Reeves, HannaThe purpose of this deliverable is for all partners to share their case designs, ethics permissions, and explain their contributions to the overall project goal. The project aims to create an innovative, evidence-based aesthetic and embodied pedagogical Framework that impacts the practice of education for democracy and the associated Guides to pedagogical practice that support responsive, participatory pedagogies.1 For that, the six AECED partner countries use a Participatory Action Research (PAR) design through which they co-create, trial, and analyse a prototype pedagogical Framework and four associated Guides for elementary school, secondary school, higher education, and adult/professional education. In this deliverable, we present the case design for all 19 cases, covering a wide array of institutional trialing settings to ensure a differentiated and diverse set of data for reflecting on, analysing, evaluating, and re- designing the pedagogical Framework and the practice Guides. In alignment with the research aim and overarching research questions of the project, we have formulated specific research questions for all national partners, as outlined in the methodological Framework. These questions serve as guiding principles for the cross-case analysis, ensuring that each partner's research aligns with the overall objectives and contributes to a comprehensive understanding of the project's focal areas. In the following, we will give a short overview of the case design phase that also encompasses the approval of each country's ethics commission. Both aspects will then be portrayed in the appendix.
- Report of methodological framework. Deliverable 4.1Publication . Spahn, Lea; Weber, Susanne; Petzold, Julia; Neves, Claudia; Oganisjana, Karine; Ozols, Rolands; Pažur, Monika; Jääskeläinen, Pauliina
- Report of methodological framework. Deliverable 4.1Publication . Spahn, Lea; Weber, Susanne; Petzold, Julia; Woods, Philip; Smith, Karen; Reeves, Hannah; Neves, Claudia; Oganisjana, Karine; Ozols, Rolands; Pažur, Monika; Jääskeläinen, Pauliina
- Transnational conclusions. Deliverable 4.5Publication . Pažur, Monika; Jääskeläinen, Pauliina; Wallenius-Korkalo, Sandra; Meriläinen, Susan; Cazgir, Kardelen Dilara; Weber, Susanne Maria; Endreß, Franziska; Tramsek, Rok; Oganisjana, Karine; Neves, Claudia; Oliveira, Juliana Gazzinelli de; Barber, Jo; Culshaw, Suzanne; Dickerson, Claire; Mpamhanga, Karen; Mulberry, Philippa; Toseland, Marie; Woods, PhilipThis document presents a cross-case analysis carried out as part of Work Package 4 (WP4) of the project. Based on findings from nineteen cases, conducted across six partner institutions, the analysis is grounded in data, insights, and thematic reflections captured in earlier project outputs, particularly the deliverables produced within WP4. Building on this foundation, D4.5 provides a critical and analytical synthesis that highlights both recurring patterns and context-specific variations across cases. By doing so, it contributes to a deeper understanding of how the AECED Project’s pedagogical and democratic aims have been implemented and interpreted in diverse educational and national settings. Part 1 comprises the following sections: 1.1 provides an overview of the multi-case trialling phase and positions this deliverable as the concluding synthesis of the AECED research phase; 1.2 outlines the methodological approach to the cross-case analysis and the development of transnational conclusions; 1.3 describes the analytical process as a two-step integrated approach; 1.4 provides reflections on the use of generative AI tools in the preparation of this deliverable; 1.5 discusses the use of Participatory Action Research (PAR) as a common methodological foundation, flexibly applied across cases with varied Aesthetic and Embodied Learning for Democracy (AELD) approaches and arts-based and embodied (ABE) methods; 1.6 presents cross- case reflections on ethical considerations, and 1.7 offers cross-case reflections on the gender dimension within this research project.