| Nome: | Descrição: | Tamanho: | Formato: | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 773.11 KB | Adobe PDF |
Orientador(es)
Resumo(s)
Este artigo analisa como a direção escolar, os professores e as famílias percecionam a integração de alunos imigrantes brasileiros no 1.º ciclo do ensino básico, num estudo de caso realizado numa escola do centro urbano de Braga. O problema de investigação centra-se nas tensões entre a integração administrativa e a inclusão educativa plena. Recorreu-se a uma abordagem predominantemente qualitativa, com triangulação metodológica: entrevistas com responsáveis institucionais e questionários com docentes e encarregados de educação. Os resultados mostram uma avaliação globalmente positiva do acolhimento, mas identificam entraves recorrentes: descontinuidades curriculares e decisões de equivalência, barreiras sociolinguísticas subtis apesar da língua comum, necessidade de tempo e apoio emocional no período inicial e limitações de recursos humanos especializados. As famílias valorizam a dimensão relacional e apontam melhorias na comunicação escola-família e na construção de comunidade. Conclui-se que a língua partilhada não elimina desigualdades e que a integração beneficia de estratégias sistemáticas de acolhimento, diferenciação pedagógica e mediação cultural, reforçando as condições para uma inclusão mais equitativa.
This paper examines how school leadership, teachers and families perceive the integration of Brazilian immigrant pupils in Portuguese primary education (1st cycle), through a case study in an urban school in Braga. The research problem focuses on tensions between administrative integration and substantive educational inclusion. A predominantly qualitative design was used, combining methodological triangulation: interviews with institutional stakeholders and questionnaires to teachers and parents/guardians. Findings indicate an overall positive appraisal of welcoming practices, yet recurrent barriers persist: curricular discontinuities and grade-placement/equivalence decisions, subtle sociolinguistic obstacles despite a shared language, the need for time and emotional support during the initial adjustment, and limited specialised human resources. Families emphasise relational dimensions and call for stronger school-family communication and community-building. The study concludes that a common language does not remove inequities and that integration is strengthened by systematic reception protocols, pedagogical differentiation and cultural mediation, supporting more equitable inclusion.
This paper examines how school leadership, teachers and families perceive the integration of Brazilian immigrant pupils in Portuguese primary education (1st cycle), through a case study in an urban school in Braga. The research problem focuses on tensions between administrative integration and substantive educational inclusion. A predominantly qualitative design was used, combining methodological triangulation: interviews with institutional stakeholders and questionnaires to teachers and parents/guardians. Findings indicate an overall positive appraisal of welcoming practices, yet recurrent barriers persist: curricular discontinuities and grade-placement/equivalence decisions, subtle sociolinguistic obstacles despite a shared language, the need for time and emotional support during the initial adjustment, and limited specialised human resources. Families emphasise relational dimensions and call for stronger school-family communication and community-building. The study concludes that a common language does not remove inequities and that integration is strengthened by systematic reception protocols, pedagogical differentiation and cultural mediation, supporting more equitable inclusion.
Descrição
Palavras-chave
Integração escolar Inclusão Alunos imigrantes Alunos brasileiros 1.º ciclo Estudo de caso School integration Inclusion Immigrant pupils Brazilian pupils Primary education Case study
Contexto Educativo
Citação
Martins, H., & Neves, C. (2026). Entre integração e inclusão: Perceções de atores educativos sobre alunos brasileiros no 1.º ciclo. Aprender, 51, 27–42. https://doi.org/10.58041/aprender.276