Browsing by Author "Koulaouzidis, Giorgos"
Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
Results Per Page
Sort Options
- OpenEU WP5.3 – Framework for the digital transformation of on-campus HEIsPublication . Santos, Arnaldo; Morgado, Leonel; São Mamede, Henrique; Koulaouzidis, Giorgos; Ilcheva, Maria; Plaksenkova, Ilona; Kuijpers, Chris; Guasch, Teresa; Magnússon, Magnús Árni Skjöld; Peratikou, Adamantini; Bills, Annabell; Kalles, Dimitris; Brouns, Francis; Gil-Jaurena, InésThis framework operationalises the institutional transition from primarily on campus provision to sustainable hybrid and online provision. It consolidates strategy and governance, platforms and IT operations, pedagogy and staff development, student services, quality assurance, communication, and institutional context into a facilitation ready checklist (Areas → Subareas → Topics → Diagnostic questions). The instrument was field validated in 2025 through expert engagements and aligns with WP5 Task 5.3 and the planned Digital Transformation Toolkit (D5.3/D5.1, depending on internal numbering). For background and evidence, consult the bundled paper: Santos, A., Morgado, L., Mamede, H., Koulaouzidis, G., Ilcheva, M., Kuijpers, C., Guasch, T., Magnússon, M. Á. S., Peratikou, A., Plaksenkova, I., Bills, A., Kalles, D., Brouns, F., & Gil-Jaurena, I. (in press). Transformation framework for transitioning traditional universities to online open education. In Proceedings of the EADTU 2025 Conference. EADTU.
- Transformation framework for transitioning traditional universities to online open educationPublication . Santos, Arnaldo; São Mamede, Henrique; Morgado, Leonel; Koulaouzidis, Giorgos; Ilcheva, Maria; Kuijpers, Chris; Guasch, Teresa; European Association of Distance Teaching UniversitiesWe present a nine-dimension institutional framework that guides traditional universities in transitioning to high-quality hybrid and online provision. Building on EADTU’s E-xcellence manual, we bring to the fore enterprise architecture/interoperability, service digitisation, change-and-incentive systems, and governance/decision rights, by combining expert individual and panel contributions. We then operationalise this into a facilitation-ready checklist (Areas, Sub-areas, Topics, and Diagnostic questions), and add an institution-level maturity model to support prioritisation and roadmap design. We report on qualitative field validation through three one-week expert engagements (March-April 2025), which combined leadership briefings, semi-structured interviews, artifact reviews, and synthesis reports. The framework proved usable for cross-unit dialogue, was diagnostically sensitive to system-level blockers (interoperability and operations, digitization of academic/administrative services, change management, and incentives), and was actiongenerative, informing roadmaps for 12-24 months. We propose testable propositions linking governance/platform readiness to pedagogy, services, and outcomes. The full checklist and facilitation materials are released in an open repository to enable institutional self-assessment and comparative research.