Loading...
Publication
A dimensão dialógica dos atos ilocucionários na tessitura argumentativa dos gêneros acadêmicos: uma análise pragmático-discursiva de dissertações
| Name: | Description: | Size: | Format: | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1.48 MB | Adobe PDF |
Authors
Advisor(s)
Abstract(s)
Este trabalho tem como objeto de estudo a dialogicidade dos atos ilocucionários na construção argumentativa de gêneros acadêmicos, especificamente dissertações de mestrado produzidas no Brasil e em Portugal. Para isso, foram selecionadas dissertações de repositórios científicos desses países, cujas “Introduções” e “Conclusões” serviram de corpora para a análise pretendida. Sob uma abordagem qualitativa, com viés etnográfico e intercultural, através de pesquisa bibliográfica e documental, este estudo enquadra-se nos pressupostos teóricos da Pragmática Linguística, da Linguística Textual, da Análise do Discurso e da Teoria da Argumentação no Discurso. Assim fundamenta-se nas pesquisas defendidas por Austin (1990 [1962]) e Searle (2000, 2005 [1979], 2011 [1969]), também Rajagopalan (1990, 1996, 2010) sobre os atos de linguagem; nos contributos de Authier-Revuz (1990, 1999, 2004), Bakhtin (1993, 1997 [1979]), Bres e Nowakowska (2006), eVolóchinov (2018 [1929]), quanto a dialogismo; nas pesquisas de Swales (1990) sobre comunidade discursiva; e nos estudos de Amossy (2007, 2008, 2011, 2016, 2018[2000],2022), Hyland (2005, 2008, 2012), Koch e Elias (2016), Rabatel (2004a, 2004b, 2014), e Silva e Santos (2020), a respeito da argumentação no discurso acadêmico. Consoante os corpora, depreendemos que os atos de linguagem revelam as dimensões dialógicas conforme o valor argumentativo pretendido para defender o ponto de vista (PDV) do locutor, considerando ainda a sua responsabilidade e postura enunciativas perante o interlocutor. Ademais, afirmamos que tais produções acadêmicas são um reflexo do panorama sociocultural e histórico dos seus autores, os quais ainda acrescentam seu conhecimento de mundo àquilo que escrevem.
This paper aims to study the dialogicity of illocutionary acts in the argumentative construction of academic genres, specifically master's dissertations produced in Brazil and Portugal. To this end, dissertations were selected from scientific repositories of the secountries, whose "Introductions" and "Conclusions" served as corpora for the intended analysis. Under a qualitative approach, with ethnographic and intercultural bias, through bibliographic and documental research, this study is framed by the theoretical assumptionsof Linguistic Pragmatics, Textual Linguistics, Discourse Analysis and Argumentation Theory of Discourse. Thus it is grounded in the research advocated by Austin (1990 [1962]) and Searle (2000, 2005 [1979], 2011 [1969]), also Rajagopalan (1990, 1996, 2010) on language acts; in the contributions of Authier-Revuz (1990, 1999, 2004), Bakhtin (1993,1997 [1979]), Bres and Nowakowska (2006), and Volóchinov (2018 [1929]), regarding dialogism; in Swales' (1990) research on discourse community; and in Amossy's (2007,2008, 2011, 2016, 2018 [2000], 2022), Hyland's (2005, 2008, 2012), KochandElias' (2016), Rabatel's (2004a, 2004b, 2014), and Silva and Santos' (2020) studies, regarding argumentation in academic discourse. According to the corpora, we deduce that the language acts reveal the dialogical dimensions according to the argumentative valueintended to defend the speaker's point of view (POS), also considering his enunciative responsibility and posture before the interlocutor. Furthermore, we affirmthat such academic productions are a reflection of the sociocultural and historical backgroundoftheir authors, who also add their world knowledge to what they write.
This paper aims to study the dialogicity of illocutionary acts in the argumentative construction of academic genres, specifically master's dissertations produced in Brazil and Portugal. To this end, dissertations were selected from scientific repositories of the secountries, whose "Introductions" and "Conclusions" served as corpora for the intended analysis. Under a qualitative approach, with ethnographic and intercultural bias, through bibliographic and documental research, this study is framed by the theoretical assumptionsof Linguistic Pragmatics, Textual Linguistics, Discourse Analysis and Argumentation Theory of Discourse. Thus it is grounded in the research advocated by Austin (1990 [1962]) and Searle (2000, 2005 [1979], 2011 [1969]), also Rajagopalan (1990, 1996, 2010) on language acts; in the contributions of Authier-Revuz (1990, 1999, 2004), Bakhtin (1993,1997 [1979]), Bres and Nowakowska (2006), and Volóchinov (2018 [1929]), regarding dialogism; in Swales' (1990) research on discourse community; and in Amossy's (2007,2008, 2011, 2016, 2018 [2000], 2022), Hyland's (2005, 2008, 2012), KochandElias' (2016), Rabatel's (2004a, 2004b, 2014), and Silva and Santos' (2020) studies, regarding argumentation in academic discourse. According to the corpora, we deduce that the language acts reveal the dialogical dimensions according to the argumentative valueintended to defend the speaker's point of view (POS), also considering his enunciative responsibility and posture before the interlocutor. Furthermore, we affirmthat such academic productions are a reflection of the sociocultural and historical backgroundoftheir authors, who also add their world knowledge to what they write.
Description
Keywords
Atos ilocucionários Dialogismo Discurso académico Argumentação Illocutionary acts Dialogism Academic discourse Argumentation
Citation
Silva, Simone Souza Cunha da - A dimensão dialógica dos atos ilocucionários na tessitura argumentativa dos gêneros acadêmicos [Em linha]: uma análise pragmático-discursiva de dissertações. Lisboa: [s.n.], 2023. 131 p.