Percorrer por autor "Weber, Susanne Maria"
A mostrar 1 - 5 de 5
Resultados por página
Opções de ordenação
- Data analysis reports. Deliverable 4.4Publication . Pažur, Monika; Slovaček, Katarina Aladrović; Domović, Vlatka; Drvodelić, Maja; Jurinović, Maša Rimac; Jääskeläinen, Pauliina; Wallenius-Korkalo, Sandra; Meriläinen, Susan; Cazgir, Kardelen Dilara; Pinzger, Vero; Weber, Susanne Maria; Spahn, Lea; Oganisjana, Karine; Oliveira, Juliana Gazzinelli de; Almeida, Ana Patrícia; Abelha, Marta; Abrantes, Pedro; Neves, ClaudiaThis deliverable contains the completed case studies of the 19 cases outlined in the AECED project proposal. These case research reports were handed in separately for each case study by each country. Case study reports include the following sections: 1) Case Description: a descriptive overview of participants, location, purpose - relevance to democracy-as-becoming, research activities and methods, researchers, and timeframe. 2) Brief Explanation of the Data Analysis: a concise ground before presenting research findings, including data types and sources, research methodologies and methods, and theoretical background. 3) Research Findings: the key outcomes and findings related to the AECED Project common research questions (RQ1-4). 4) Limitations: reflection on research methods and methodological limitations. 5) Relevance of context: reflection on how context-specific factors influenced the findings, and how contextual elements shaped participants' engagement and interpretation of the Framework and Guides. 6) Learnings for the Pedagogical Framework and Guides: evidence-based outcomes and key findings for improving the Pedagogical Framework and Guides with reflection on three dimensions of transformation, referencing the AECED Project methodological framework. 7) Ethical reflection and Gender dimension: reflection on the ethics and gender dimension in research and data analysis. The references for each country's case research are compiled into a single reference list at the end of the country reports.
- Developing democratic engagements and transformation in adult, professional and organisational learning: a practice companion for inspiring your facilitation and change-makingPublication . Weber, Susanne Maria; Spahn, Lea; Pinzger, Veronika Clara; Mpamhanga, Karen; Petzold, Julia; Jääskeläinen, Pauliina; Oganisjana, Karine; Abelha, Marta; Abrantes, Pedro; Almeida, Ana Patrícia; Barber, Joanne; Cazgir, Kardelen Dilara; Culshaw, Suzanne; Dickerson, Claire; Meriläinen, Susan; Netter, Dirk; Neves, Claudia; Oliveira, Juliana Gazzinelli de; Toseland, Marie; Vola, Joonas; Wallenius-Korkalo, Sandra; Wolter, Helena; Woods, Philip A.; Yalvac, Canan; Weber, Susanne Maria
- Guide for aesthetic and embodied learning for democracy in the field of adult, professional and organisational learningPublication . Spahn, Lea; Weber, Susanne Maria; Mpamhanga, Karen; Jääskeläinen, Pauliina; Neves, Claudia; Oganisjana, Karine; Abelha, Marta; Abrantes, Pedro; Almeida, Ana Patrícia; Barber, Joanne; Cazgir, Kardelen Dilara; Culshaw, Suzanne; Dickerson, Claire; Meriläinen, Susan; Netter, Dirk; Oliveira, Juliana Gazzinelli de; Ozols, Rolands; Pinzger, Veronika Clara; Toseland, Marie; Vola, Joonas; Wallenius-Korkalo, Sandra; Wolter, Helena; Woods, Philip A.
- “Lifting the Roof” with democracy-as-becoming: the potential of aesthetic and embodied learning for innovating governance in educational institutions a pattern approachPublication . Spahn, Lea; Weber, Susanne Maria; Jääskeläinen, Pauliina; Mpamhanga, Karen; Neves, Claudia; Oganisjana, Karine; OliverContemporary societies face interrelated crises that strain democratic institutions, social cohesion, and ecological conditions. This article approaches governance as a relational, processual practice that can be reconfigured in and through aesthetic and embodied approaches. Drawing on qualitative material generated in the three-year Horizon Europe/UKRI project Transforming Education for Democracy through Aesthetic and Embodied Learning, Responsive Pedagogy and Democracy-as-becoming, the analysis revisits case studies with a focus on aesthetic and embodied learning in adult, professional, and organizational learning settings to ask what patterns of governance innovation towards democracy-as-becoming become visible when democratic learning is enacted as embodied, situated practice. Empirically, the study draws on data generated through case trials in six European countries with a participatory action research design and unfolds five patterns with analytic vignettes that illuminate repeating moments, processes and situations of embodied governance. Conceptually, the article is informed by an epistemic shift towards commoning, framing governance as embedded in concrete practices of possibility rather than bounded procedures. A pattern-oriented re-reading identifies recurring situations in which governance shifts are enacted through power-sharing, transforming dialogue, relational well-being, and holistic learning. These shifts appear as changes in individual stance, collective practice, and institutional culture, including processes of unlearning hierarchy and reworking institutionalized power relations. By articulating “promising patterns” grounded in situated educational practice, the article links democratic renewal to common(ing) activities and collective imagination in education.
- Transnational conclusions. Deliverable 4.5Publication . Pažur, Monika; Jääskeläinen, Pauliina; Wallenius-Korkalo, Sandra; Meriläinen, Susan; Cazgir, Kardelen Dilara; Weber, Susanne Maria; Endreß, Franziska; Tramsek, Rok; Oganisjana, Karine; Neves, Claudia; Oliveira, Juliana Gazzinelli de; Barber, Jo; Culshaw, Suzanne; Dickerson, Claire; Mpamhanga, Karen; Mulberry, Philippa; Toseland, Marie; Woods, PhilipThis document presents a cross-case analysis carried out as part of Work Package 4 (WP4) of the project. Based on findings from nineteen cases, conducted across six partner institutions, the analysis is grounded in data, insights, and thematic reflections captured in earlier project outputs, particularly the deliverables produced within WP4. Building on this foundation, D4.5 provides a critical and analytical synthesis that highlights both recurring patterns and context-specific variations across cases. By doing so, it contributes to a deeper understanding of how the AECED Project’s pedagogical and democratic aims have been implemented and interpreted in diverse educational and national settings. Part 1 comprises the following sections: 1.1 provides an overview of the multi-case trialling phase and positions this deliverable as the concluding synthesis of the AECED research phase; 1.2 outlines the methodological approach to the cross-case analysis and the development of transnational conclusions; 1.3 describes the analytical process as a two-step integrated approach; 1.4 provides reflections on the use of generative AI tools in the preparation of this deliverable; 1.5 discusses the use of Participatory Action Research (PAR) as a common methodological foundation, flexibly applied across cases with varied Aesthetic and Embodied Learning for Democracy (AELD) approaches and arts-based and embodied (ABE) methods; 1.6 presents cross- case reflections on ethical considerations, and 1.7 offers cross-case reflections on the gender dimension within this research project.