Percorrer por autor "Spahn, Lea"
A mostrar 1 - 7 de 7
Resultados por página
Opções de ordenação
- Connecting with democracy: a pedagogical framework for education for democracyPublication . Jääskeläinen, Pauliina; Lantela, Pilvikki; Meriläinen, Susan; Vola, Joonas; Wallenius-Korkalo, Sandra; Aladrović Slovaček, Katarina; Pažur, Monika; Dilara Cazgir, Kardelen; Clara Pinzger, Veronika; Spahn, Lea; Maria Weber, Susanne; Dumins, Uldis; Oganisjana, Karine; Abelha, Marta; Almeida, Ana Patrícia; Abrantes, Pedro; Neves, Claudia; Oliveira, Juliana Gazzinelli de; Barber, Jo; Culshaw, Suzanne; Dickerson, Claire; Mpamhanga, Karen; Mulberry, Philippa; Toseland, Marie; Woods, Philip
- Data analysis reports. Deliverable 4.4Publication . Pažur, Monika; Slovaček, Katarina Aladrović; Domović, Vlatka; Drvodelić, Maja; Jurinović, Maša Rimac; Jääskeläinen, Pauliina; Wallenius-Korkalo, Sandra; Meriläinen, Susan; Cazgir, Kardelen Dilara; Pinzger, Vero; Weber, Susanne Maria; Spahn, Lea; Oganisjana, Karine; Neves, Cláudia; Oliveira, Juliana Gazzinelli de; Almeida, Ana Patrícia; Abelha, Marta; Abrantes, PedroThis deliverable contains the completed case studies of the 19 cases outlined in the AECED project proposal. These case research reports were handed in separately for each case study by each country. Case study reports include the following sections: 1) Case Description: a descriptive overview of participants, location, purpose - relevance to democracy-as-becoming, research activities and methods, researchers, and timeframe. 2) Brief Explanation of the Data Analysis: a concise ground before presenting research findings, including data types and sources, research methodologies and methods, and theoretical background. 3) Research Findings: the key outcomes and findings related to the AECED Project common research questions (RQ1-4). 4) Limitations: reflection on research methods and methodological limitations. 5) Relevance of context: reflection on how context-specific factors influenced the findings, and how contextual elements shaped participants' engagement and interpretation of the Framework and Guides. 6) Learnings for the Pedagogical Framework and Guides: evidence-based outcomes and key findings for improving the Pedagogical Framework and Guides with reflection on three dimensions of transformation, referencing the AECED Project methodological framework. 7) Ethical reflection and Gender dimension: reflection on the ethics and gender dimension in research and data analysis. The references for each country's case research are compiled into a single reference list at the end of the country reports.
- Prototype framework, including its rationale, development and features – in English language and partner country language versions. Deliverable 3.1Publication . Neves, Claudia; Abelha, Marta; Almeida, Ana Patrícia; Abrantes, Pedro; Jääskeläinen, Pauliina; Culshaw, Suzanne; Cazgir, Kardelen; Oganisjana, Karine; Ozols, Roland; Pažur, Monika; Petzold, Julia; Smith, Karen; Spahn, Lea; Weber, Susanne ; Woods, Philip
- Prototype guides – in English language and partner country language versions. Deliverable D3.2Publication . Neves, Claudia; Abelha, Marta; Almeida, Ana Patrícia; Abrantes, Pedro; Jääskeläinen, Pauliina; Culshaw, Suzanne; Cazgir, Kardelen; Oganisjana, Karine; Ozols, Roland; Pažur, Monika; Petzold, Julia; Spahn, Lea; Weber, Susanne ; Aladrović, Katarina; Smith, Karen; Woods, Philip
- Report case(s) Design. Report, by each partner, of their case(s) design (including ethics permission) and how it contributes to the total projectPublication . Pažur, Monika; Jääskeläinen, Pauliina; Petzold, Julia; Cazgir, Kardelen; Spahn, Lea; Weber, Susanne; Kozlovskis, Konstantins; Oganisjana, Karine; Lace, Natalja; Ozols, Rolands; Neves, Claudia; Almeida, Ana Patrícia; Abelha, Marta; Oliveira, Juliana Gazzinelli de; Abrantes, Pedro; Woods, Philip; Mpamhanga, Karen; Culshaw, Suzanne; Reeves, HannaThe purpose of this deliverable is for all partners to share their case designs, ethics permissions, and explain their contributions to the overall project goal. The project aims to create an innovative, evidence-based aesthetic and embodied pedagogical Framework that impacts the practice of education for democracy and the associated Guides to pedagogical practice that support responsive, participatory pedagogies.1 For that, the six AECED partner countries use a Participatory Action Research (PAR) design through which they co-create, trial, and analyse a prototype pedagogical Framework and four associated Guides for elementary school, secondary school, higher education, and adult/professional education. In this deliverable, we present the case design for all 19 cases, covering a wide array of institutional trialing settings to ensure a differentiated and diverse set of data for reflecting on, analysing, evaluating, and re- designing the pedagogical Framework and the practice Guides. In alignment with the research aim and overarching research questions of the project, we have formulated specific research questions for all national partners, as outlined in the methodological Framework. These questions serve as guiding principles for the cross-case analysis, ensuring that each partner's research aligns with the overall objectives and contributes to a comprehensive understanding of the project's focal areas. In the following, we will give a short overview of the case design phase that also encompasses the approval of each country's ethics commission. Both aspects will then be portrayed in the appendix.
- Report of methodological framework. Deliverable 4.1Publication . Spahn, Lea; Weber, Susanne; Petzold, Julia; Neves, Claudia; Oganisjana, Karine; Ozols, Rolands; Pažur, Monika; Jääskeläinen, Pauliina
- Report of methodological framework. Deliverable 4.1Publication . Spahn, Lea; Weber, Susanne; Petzold, Julia; Woods, Philip; Smith, Karen; Reeves, Hannah; Neves, Claudia; Oganisjana, Karine; Ozols, Rolands; Pažur, Monika; Jääskeläinen, Pauliina