Browsing by Author "Cazgir, Kardelen Dilara"
Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
Results Per Page
Sort Options
- Data analysis reports. Deliverable 4.4Publication . Pažur, Monika; Slovaček, Katarina Aladrović; Domović, Vlatka; Drvodelić, Maja; Jurinović, Maša Rimac; Jääskeläinen, Pauliina; Wallenius-Korkalo, Sandra; Meriläinen, Susan; Cazgir, Kardelen Dilara; Pinzger, Vero; Weber, Susanne Maria; Spahn, Lea; Oganisjana, Karine; Neves, Cláudia; Oliveira, Juliana Gazzinelli de; Almeida, Ana Patrícia; Abelha, Marta; Abrantes, PedroThis deliverable contains the completed case studies of the 19 cases outlined in the AECED project proposal. These case research reports were handed in separately for each case study by each country. Case study reports include the following sections: 1) Case Description: a descriptive overview of participants, location, purpose - relevance to democracy-as-becoming, research activities and methods, researchers, and timeframe. 2) Brief Explanation of the Data Analysis: a concise ground before presenting research findings, including data types and sources, research methodologies and methods, and theoretical background. 3) Research Findings: the key outcomes and findings related to the AECED Project common research questions (RQ1-4). 4) Limitations: reflection on research methods and methodological limitations. 5) Relevance of context: reflection on how context-specific factors influenced the findings, and how contextual elements shaped participants' engagement and interpretation of the Framework and Guides. 6) Learnings for the Pedagogical Framework and Guides: evidence-based outcomes and key findings for improving the Pedagogical Framework and Guides with reflection on three dimensions of transformation, referencing the AECED Project methodological framework. 7) Ethical reflection and Gender dimension: reflection on the ethics and gender dimension in research and data analysis. The references for each country's case research are compiled into a single reference list at the end of the country reports.
- Transnational conclusions. Deliverable 4.5Publication . Pažur, Monika; Jääskeläinen, Pauliina; Wallenius-Korkalo, Sandra; Meriläinen, Susan; Cazgir, Kardelen Dilara; Weber, Susanne Maria; Endreß, Franziska; Tramsek, Rok; Oganisjana, Karine; Neves, Cláudia; Oliveira, Juliana Gazzinelli de; Barber, Jo; Culshaw, Suzanne; Dickerson, Claire; Mpamhanga, Karen; Mulberry, Philippa; Toseland, Marie; Woods, PhilipThis document presents a cross-case analysis carried out as part of Work Package 4 (WP4) of the project. Based on findings from nineteen cases, conducted across six partner institutions, the analysis is grounded in data, insights, and thematic reflections captured in earlier project outputs, particularly the deliverables produced within WP4. Building on this foundation, D4.5 provides a critical and analytical synthesis that highlights both recurring patterns and context-specific variations across cases. By doing so, it contributes to a deeper understanding of how the AECED Project’s pedagogical and democratic aims have been implemented and interpreted in diverse educational and national settings. Part 1 comprises the following sections: 1.1 provides an overview of the multi-case trialling phase and positions this deliverable as the concluding synthesis of the AECED research phase; 1.2 outlines the methodological approach to the cross-case analysis and the development of transnational conclusions; 1.3 describes the analytical process as a two-step integrated approach; 1.4 provides reflections on the use of generative AI tools in the preparation of this deliverable; 1.5 discusses the use of Participatory Action Research (PAR) as a common methodological foundation, flexibly applied across cases with varied Aesthetic and Embodied Learning for Democracy (AELD) approaches and arts-based and embodied (ABE) methods; 1.6 presents cross- case reflections on ethical considerations, and 1.7 offers cross-case reflections on the gender dimension within this research project.