Repository logo
 
Publication

Divergent perceptions from MOOC designers and learners on interaction and learning experience: findings from the Global MOOQ Survey

dc.contributor.authorTeixeira, António
dc.contributor.authorPinto, Maria do Carmo Teixeira
dc.contributor.authorStracke, Cristhian
dc.contributor.authorKameas, Achiles
dc.contributor.authorVassiliadis, Bill
dc.contributor.authorSgouropoulou, Cleo
dc.date.accessioned2020-05-26T14:42:13Z
dc.date.available2020-05-26T14:42:13Z
dc.date.issued2018
dc.date.updated2020-04-25T17:07:33Z
dc.description.abstractAs the provision of MOOCs continues to grow exponentially across the globe, much of the criticism on the quality of the learning experiences provided is based on its typically low drop-out rates. There is strong evidence that completion is not a goal for the majority of MOOC participants neither does it affect their satisfaction and perception of the quality of their learning experiences. Based on a literature review and analysis of existing quality approaches and indicators for MOOCs, the Global MOOC Quality Survey was designed and conducted in order to access quality perceptions of actors in the MOOC design and implementation process(n = 267). In this paper, we present its first results relating to the designers’ and learners’ experiences with MOOCs and their offered four interaction types: learner-facilitator (LF), learner-resource (LR), learner-learner (LL) and group-group (GG). Comparing the different perspectives of learners and designers, our analysis presents significant differences in MOOC learners’ and designers’ intentions and experiences. The correlation differences of the MOOC learners and designers on the interaction in MOOCs are significantly very high. These results are also compared with the opinions from MOOC designers collected in a number of semi-structured interviews. Based on the analysis, we conclude this divergence is based on a misunderstanding between the two target groups on interaction. MOOC designers recognise its importance, but do not seem to understand and meet fully the expectations of MOOC learners, as their perception maybe influenced by institutional context.pt_PT
dc.description.sponsorshipThis article is supported by MOOQ, the European Alliance for Quality of Massive Open Online Courses (www.MOOC-quality.eu). The vision of MOOQ is to foster quality in MOOCs leading to a new era of learning experiences. MOOQ is funded by the European Commission under the project number: 2015-1-NL01-KA203-008950pt_PT
dc.description.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionpt_PT
dc.identifier.isbn978-615-5511-23-3
dc.identifier.slugcv-prod-1759977
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10400.2/9715
dc.language.isoengpt_PT
dc.peerreviewedyespt_PT
dc.titleDivergent perceptions from MOOC designers and learners on interaction and learning experience: findings from the Global MOOQ Surveypt_PT
dc.typeconference object
dspace.entity.typePublication
oaire.citation.conferencePlaceGenovapt_PT
oaire.citation.endPage225pt_PT
oaire.citation.startPage215pt_PT
oaire.citation.titleProceedings of the European Distance and E-Learning Network. Annual Conferencept_PT
person.familyNameTeixeira
person.familyNamePinto
person.givenNameAntónio
person.givenNameMaria do Carmo Teixeira
person.identifier.ciencia-id7810-ACD0-18B2
person.identifier.ciencia-id1B1F-2287-94E6
person.identifier.orcid0000-0002-1339-6548
person.identifier.orcid0000-0001-5113-5851
rcaap.cv.cienciaid1B1F-2287-94E6 | Maria do Carmo Teixeira Pinto
rcaap.rightsopenAccesspt_PT
rcaap.typeconferenceObjectpt_PT
relation.isAuthorOfPublicatione6474cc5-0c39-4eb5-ba27-a3f19964333f
relation.isAuthorOfPublication08609be9-2de1-4d6e-9563-baeed92b4135
relation.isAuthorOfPublication.latestForDiscovery08609be9-2de1-4d6e-9563-baeed92b4135

Files

Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
EDEN_Genova_2018-paginas-215-225.pdf
Size:
2.47 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.97 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: