Loading...
Publication
O estereótipo no donjuanismo
| Name: | Description: | Size: | Format: | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1.26 MB | Adobe PDF |
Authors
Advisor(s)
Abstract(s)
O Mito de D. Juan ainda continua vivo ou, pelo contrário, extinguiu-se, tornando-se uma lenda ligada ao donjuanismo? Esta foi a principal interrogação que motivou a autora deste trabalho.
Confrontados com um número de obras e de opiniões muito considerável a respeito deste mito, pretendeu-se, num primeiro momento, fixar uma noção de mito que permitisse fundamentar a sua existência nas sociedades históricas e na actualidade.
Partindo principalmente da valorização da linguagem na construção do mito, sugerida por Roland Barthes em Mitologias, e por Luís Cencillo em Mito, Semántica e realidad, procurou-se encontrar na linguagem de sedução um espaço de trabalho, aberto à aplicação de uma análise literária pragmática, que permitisse uma compreensão do Mito de Don Juan.
Servindo-se particularmente das leituras de Ruth Amossy a respeito do estereótipo, a autora estendeu este estudo à produção literária donjuanina na literatura portuguesa, particularmente às mais representativas em termos de reconhecimento literário e de actualidade, a saber: A Morte de D. João, de Guerra Junqueiro; D. João e Máscara, de António Patrício; D. João e Julieta, de Natália Correia; D. João no Jardim das Delícias, de Norberto Ávila e D. Giovanni ou o Dissoluto Absolvido, de José Saramago.
A autora desta dissertação de mestrado concluiu que o Mito de Don Juan, enquanto mito da palavra, não é identificável com um mito literário. Não foi a literatura que criou o mito de D. Juan, mas foi o Mito de D. Juan que se apropriou da literatura, particularmente do teatro, como o espaço ideal para a sua concretização material de mito por excelência da palavra
Le Mythe de D. Juan est-il encore vivant ou, par contre, il est mort, devenant une légende liée au donjuanisme ? C’est la principale interrogation qui a motivé l'auteur de ce travail. Devant un nombre d'oeuvres et d'avis très considérable concernant le Mythe de D. Juan, il s'est prétendu, dans un premier moment, de fixer une notion de mythe qui permettait de baser son existence dans les sociétés historiques et dans l'actualité. En partant principalement de l'évaluation du langage dans la construction du mythe, suggéré par Roland Barthes en Mythologies, et par Luís Cencillo en Mito, Semántica e realidad, il s’est cherché à trouver dans le langage de séduction un espace de travail ouvert à l'application d'une analyse littéraire pragmatique, qui permettait une compréhension du Mythe de Don Juan. En se servant particulièrement des lectures de Ruth Amossy concernant le stéréotype, l'auteur a élargi cette étude à la production littéraire donjuanine dans la littérature portugaise, particulièrement dans les plus représentatives en termes de reconnaissance littéraire et d'actualité, à savoir : A Morte de D. João, de Guerra Junqueiro ; D. João e a Máscara, de António Patrício; D. João e Julieta, de Natália Correia; D. João no Jardim das Delícias, de Norberto Ávila e D. Giovanni ou o Dissoluto Absolvido, de José Saramago. L’auteur de ce travail a conclu que le Mythe de Don Juan, en tant que mythe de la parole, n’est pas identifiable à un mythe littéraire. Ce n’est pas la littérature qui l'a créé, mais c’est le Mythe de D. Juan qui s'est approprié de la littérature, particulièrement du théâtre, comme l’espace idéal pour sa concrétisation matérielle de mythe par excellence de la parole
Is the Myth of D. Juan still alive or, on the contrary, has it become extinct, becoming a legend, related to donjuanism? This was the main issue that has motivated the author of this work. Basing in mind a very considerable number of pieces of work and opinions regarding this myth, it was intended, at a first moment, to define a myth notion that allowed explaining its existence in previous historical societies and current moments. Starting mainly from the value of the language in the formation of the myth, suggested by Roland Barthes in Mythologies and by Luis Cencillo in Mito, Semántica e realidad, in the language of seduction a field of analysis was meant to be found, open to the use of a pragmatic literary study, which allowed the understanding of the Myth of Don Juan. Based particularly on the readings of Ruth Amossy concerning the stereotype, the author extended this study to the donjuan literary production in Portuguese Literature, particularly to the most representative in terms of literary and current recognition, namely: A Morte de D. João, by Guerra Junqueiro; D. João e a Máscara, by António Patrício; D. João e Julieta, by Natália Correia; D. João no Jardim das Delícias, by Norberto Ávila and O Dissoluto Absolvido, by José Saramago. The author of this work concluded that the Myth of Don Juan, being a myth of the lexicon, is not identifiable with a literary myth. It was not literature that created the myth of D. Juan, but the Myth of D. Juan that took hold of itself in literature, namely on drama, as the ideal area for its mythical fulfilment as far as the word is concerned
Le Mythe de D. Juan est-il encore vivant ou, par contre, il est mort, devenant une légende liée au donjuanisme ? C’est la principale interrogation qui a motivé l'auteur de ce travail. Devant un nombre d'oeuvres et d'avis très considérable concernant le Mythe de D. Juan, il s'est prétendu, dans un premier moment, de fixer une notion de mythe qui permettait de baser son existence dans les sociétés historiques et dans l'actualité. En partant principalement de l'évaluation du langage dans la construction du mythe, suggéré par Roland Barthes en Mythologies, et par Luís Cencillo en Mito, Semántica e realidad, il s’est cherché à trouver dans le langage de séduction un espace de travail ouvert à l'application d'une analyse littéraire pragmatique, qui permettait une compréhension du Mythe de Don Juan. En se servant particulièrement des lectures de Ruth Amossy concernant le stéréotype, l'auteur a élargi cette étude à la production littéraire donjuanine dans la littérature portugaise, particulièrement dans les plus représentatives en termes de reconnaissance littéraire et d'actualité, à savoir : A Morte de D. João, de Guerra Junqueiro ; D. João e a Máscara, de António Patrício; D. João e Julieta, de Natália Correia; D. João no Jardim das Delícias, de Norberto Ávila e D. Giovanni ou o Dissoluto Absolvido, de José Saramago. L’auteur de ce travail a conclu que le Mythe de Don Juan, en tant que mythe de la parole, n’est pas identifiable à un mythe littéraire. Ce n’est pas la littérature qui l'a créé, mais c’est le Mythe de D. Juan qui s'est approprié de la littérature, particulièrement du théâtre, comme l’espace idéal pour sa concrétisation matérielle de mythe par excellence de la parole
Is the Myth of D. Juan still alive or, on the contrary, has it become extinct, becoming a legend, related to donjuanism? This was the main issue that has motivated the author of this work. Basing in mind a very considerable number of pieces of work and opinions regarding this myth, it was intended, at a first moment, to define a myth notion that allowed explaining its existence in previous historical societies and current moments. Starting mainly from the value of the language in the formation of the myth, suggested by Roland Barthes in Mythologies and by Luis Cencillo in Mito, Semántica e realidad, in the language of seduction a field of analysis was meant to be found, open to the use of a pragmatic literary study, which allowed the understanding of the Myth of Don Juan. Based particularly on the readings of Ruth Amossy concerning the stereotype, the author extended this study to the donjuan literary production in Portuguese Literature, particularly to the most representative in terms of literary and current recognition, namely: A Morte de D. João, by Guerra Junqueiro; D. João e a Máscara, by António Patrício; D. João e Julieta, by Natália Correia; D. João no Jardim das Delícias, by Norberto Ávila and O Dissoluto Absolvido, by José Saramago. The author of this work concluded that the Myth of Don Juan, being a myth of the lexicon, is not identifiable with a literary myth. It was not literature that created the myth of D. Juan, but the Myth of D. Juan that took hold of itself in literature, namely on drama, as the ideal area for its mythical fulfilment as far as the word is concerned
Description
Dissertação de Mestrado em Estudos Portugueses Intersisciplinares apresentada à Universidade Aberta
Keywords
Análise literária Don Juan (Personagens) Estereótipo Literatura Literatura portuguesa Mitos