Name: | Description: | Size: | Format: | |
---|---|---|---|---|
809.46 KB | Adobe PDF |
Advisor(s)
Abstract(s)
The analysis of the representation of climate and extreme weather phenomena in pictorial
sources does not result from a direct reading of the visual perception of the work.
To distinguish what is a representation of reality and what is attributed to the author's artistic
construction of free interpretation, a methodological analysis is required, which must cross
several sources that allow the obtained results to be validated as much as possible.
Moreover, the further one goes back in time, the less aware people were of the climate; thus,
the representation of extreme weather phenomena depended on the collective perception that
was made of them.
The date of the work being analysed coincides with an extraordinarily severe winter, during a
period that the scientific community designates as the Little Ice Age (LIA). This work by Pieter
Bruegel the Elder (1565-1569), is the forerunner of a style that would concur with the Dutch
Golden Age, the Winter landscape, previously represented only sporadically.
The works of this style can be studied regarding their connection with the most severe weather
cycles or patterns, which together allow the assessment of the LIA climate norms. However,
despite the climate having always been important for human communities, it must not be
looked at as the only shaper of landscapes represented throughout history. Their analysis must
also regard the social, political and cultural context, as well as the style patterns of each period.
The readings that can be done to artworks of this style are conditioned not only by the climate
deterioration of this period but also by the circumstances of extraordinary economic
development and consolidation of the nation-state: a true social and economic revolution that
created a feeling of euphoria, as opposed to the depression inherent to the LIA.
This dichotomy was reflected not only in Bruegel's work but also in works of painters such as
Hendrick Averkamp (1535-1634), Lucas van Valckenborch (1535-1597), among many others.
Do the represented weather conditions match the reality at each moment? Can the landscapes
and represented scenes be read in their limitations, as sources for the study of History? Do the
repetitions of scenes and extras in various authors suggest a collective social pattern or a unity
of style around elements of greater acceptance by the spectators?
Do the limitations inherent to painting as a perceptual element, as an aesthetic experience that
appeals to one's sensitive knowledge and affectivity, allow one to analyse it as a source for
History?
From the work "The Hunters in the Snow" by Pieter Bruegel, we will proceed to analyse the
spaces, the traces and colour, and the balances of the painting. We will continue through the
analysis of the scene and characters, the iconography, and the iconology present in the work.
Purged of elements of aesthetic or subjective nature, we can read the work as a credible source
for the study of the History of Climate.
Description
IV Encontro da REPORT(H)A - Rede Portuguesa de História Ambiental, realizado entre 14-16 de outubro de 2021.
Keywords
Painting Style unit Collective perception Historical source
Citation
Publisher
Universidade de Coimbra