Name: | Description: | Size: | Format: | |
---|---|---|---|---|
389.67 KB | Adobe PDF |
Authors
Advisor(s)
Abstract(s)
Sexual violence is a central dimension of what is generally called violence
against women. Historically, the law has been one of the structures that has reinforced
gender inequality and legitimized male seizure of women’s sexuality within and outside
marriage: legally, married women had no right to sexual freedom regarding their husbands
and, at the same time, non-wed women who pressed charges against white men were
accused of lying and faced victim-blaming judicial practices. Since the beginning of the 1990s,
Portuguese rape legislation has changed in order to recognize that sex crimes offend
someone’s right to sexual self-determination. The Criminal Code has abandoned expressions
like modesty and decency when referring to sex crimes, and a controversial mitigating penalty
norm based on a victim’s provocative behaviour or on the relation between the accused and
the plaintiff was repealed in 1995. In addition, criminal law has evolved to a gender-neutral
formulation and expanded the definition of rape adopting the “all penetration” formula.
Nevertheless, the discourses of Portuguese jurisprudence and doctrine reveal stereotyped
images about rape victims’ behaviour and biased evaluations against women. Therefore, the
‘law in books’ must be analysed in its relation with ‘law in action’, which is unescapably
influenced by doctrine and by magistrates’ individual beliefs. This paper aims to capture
judicial representations of rape, rape victims and offenders. Qualitative data are used based
on 20 semi-structured interviews with 18 judges and prosecutors and two attorneys. The
interviews were analysed through critical discourse analysis using a feminist approach. This
article is published as part of a collection on gender studies.