| Nome: | Descrição: | Tamanho: | Formato: | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 668.32 KB | Adobe PDF |
Autores
Orientador(es)
Resumo(s)
Os sistemas políticos africanos subsarianos do pós-independência nunca foram réplicas
deficientes dos principais e dominantes modelos políticos internacionais. Mesmo em
casos extremos de condicionamento internacional, como aqueles aqui analisados –Angola
e Moçambique–, sujeitos à influência de modelos socialistas durante a Guerra Fria (e só
depois “liberais”), a sua matriz neopatrimonial do pós-independência provou a sua capacidade
de se estruturarem nos seus próprios termos, nas diferentes épocas históricas, de se
reinventarem e acomodarem às influências externas através de crescente agência interna.
A sua atualmente ativa interação com as novas tendências internacionais de iliberalismo
é somente o mais recente exemplo de um longo percurso de utilização seletiva de tendências
internacionais em favor das lógicas internas dominantes de governação, que se têm
sedimentado e progredido no sentido de um patrimonialismo pós-moderno, conforme aqui
sustentado.
Sub-Saharan African post-independence political systems were never handicap replicas of main and dominant international political models. Even in extreme cases of international conditioning, as the ones here analysed – Angola and Mozambique –, under the influence of socialist models during the Cold War (and only “liberal” afterwards), their post-independence neo-patrimonial matrix proved their capacity to self-restructure in their own terms, in different historical periods, capable to reinvent and accommodate the external influences through domestic agency. Their currently active interaction with the new international illiberal currents of thought is merely the most recent example of a long path of selective use of international tendencies in favour of dominant domestic dynamics and logics of governance. Such inner dynamics have been settling and progressing towards a post-modern patrimonialism, as her e argued.
Sub-Saharan African post-independence political systems were never handicap replicas of main and dominant international political models. Even in extreme cases of international conditioning, as the ones here analysed – Angola and Mozambique –, under the influence of socialist models during the Cold War (and only “liberal” afterwards), their post-independence neo-patrimonial matrix proved their capacity to self-restructure in their own terms, in different historical periods, capable to reinvent and accommodate the external influences through domestic agency. Their currently active interaction with the new international illiberal currents of thought is merely the most recent example of a long path of selective use of international tendencies in favour of dominant domestic dynamics and logics of governance. Such inner dynamics have been settling and progressing towards a post-modern patrimonialism, as her e argued.
Descrição
Palavras-chave
Angola Moçambique Iliberalismo Patrimonialismo pósmoderno Rússia China Iliberalism Post-modern patrimonialism
