Loading...
Publication
Acessibilidade nas plataformas de webconferĂȘncia BigBlueButton V0.81 e Colibri 2.0 (Adobe Connect): caso IPLeiria
| Name: | Description: | Size: | Format: | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 369.8 KB | Adobe PDF |
Advisor(s)
Abstract(s)
No Ăąmbito dos testes de acessibilidade Ă plataforma de eLearning (Moodle 2.7) do IPLeiria, onde foi integrada a plataforma de webconferĂȘncia BigBlueButtonv 0.81, realizou-se uma sessĂŁo de teste, com leitores de ecrĂŁ, com o objetivo de avaliara acessibilidade do interface e das funcionalidades disponĂveis para a audiĂȘncia e para o apresentador. Foram tambĂ©m realizados testes de acessibilidade ao serviço Colibri 2.0 (plataforma de gestĂŁo de reuniĂ”es e Adobe Connect), uma vez que este serviço Ă© disponibilizado, de forma gratuita, pela FCT/FCCN, Ă s instituiçÔes de ensino superior portuguesas. Foram tidos como critĂ©rios de seleção da ferramenta a sua integração com a plataforma Moodle, as funcionalidades de partilha de documentos, ecrĂŁ e a gravação das sessĂ”es, assim como a acessibilidade a diferentes perfis de utilizadore a diferentes tecnologias. Foram realizados testes de perĂcia na validação da acessibilidade das plataformas, nomeadamente a navegaçã por teclado e com leitor de ecrĂŁ. Verificou-se que a plataforma BigBlueButton integrada no Moodle do IPLeiria Ă© mais amigĂĄvel para os leitores de ecrĂŁ.
In the context of the eLearning platform (Moodle 2.7) accessibility evaluation of the IPLeiria, where a web conferencing system (BigBlueButton) was integrated, we held a test session, with screen readers,on this platform to verify the accessibility of the interface and the features available to the audience and to the presenter. These accessibility tests were also performed to the Colibri service (meetings management platform and Adobe Connect), since this service is made available by the FCT/FCCN, free of charge, to the Portuguese higher education institutions. The following criteria were considered for choosingthe best platform to be used in our institution: document and screen sharing, and recording features, as well as the accessibility to different user profiles and different technologies. Skill tests were performed to validate the accessibility of the platforms, including keyboard and screen reader navigation.We have found thatthe BigBlueButton platform is more user-friendly and more accessible to screen reader users.
In the context of the eLearning platform (Moodle 2.7) accessibility evaluation of the IPLeiria, where a web conferencing system (BigBlueButton) was integrated, we held a test session, with screen readers,on this platform to verify the accessibility of the interface and the features available to the audience and to the presenter. These accessibility tests were also performed to the Colibri service (meetings management platform and Adobe Connect), since this service is made available by the FCT/FCCN, free of charge, to the Portuguese higher education institutions. The following criteria were considered for choosingthe best platform to be used in our institution: document and screen sharing, and recording features, as well as the accessibility to different user profiles and different technologies. Skill tests were performed to validate the accessibility of the platforms, including keyboard and screen reader navigation.We have found thatthe BigBlueButton platform is more user-friendly and more accessible to screen reader users.
Description
Vol. 10, NÂș especial: Acessibilidade como motor de inclusĂŁo
Keywords
eLearning WebconferĂȘncia Acessibilidade Leitor de ecrĂŁ Web conference Accessibility Screen reader
Citation
Sousa, Norberto; et al. - Acessibilidade nas plataformas de webconferĂȘncia BigBlueButton V0.81 e Colibri 2.0 (Adobe Connect): caso IPLeiria. "Revista de CiĂȘncias da Computação" [Em linha]. ISSN 1646-6330 (Print) 2182-1801 (Online). Vol. 10, nÂș especial (2015), p. 79-90
Publisher
Universidade Aberta