Loading...
Research Project
Untitled
Funder
Authors
Publications
Assessment of the genotoxic potential of contaminated estuarine sediments in fish peripheral blood: laboratory versus in situ studies
Publication . Costa, Pedro M.; Neuparth, Teresa S.; Caeiro, Sandra; Lobo, Jorge; Martins, Marta; Ferreira, Ana M.; Caetano, Miguel; Vale, Carlos; DelValls, T. Ángel; Costa, Maria Helena
Juvenile Senegalese soles (Solea senegalensis) were exposed to estuarine sediments through 28-day
laboratory and in situ (field) bioassays. The sediments, collected from three distinct sites (a reference
plus two contaminated) of the Sado Estuary (W Portugal) were characterized for total organic matter,
redox potential, fine fraction and for the levels of metals, polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) and
organochlorines, namely polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) and dichloro diphenyl tricholoethane plus
its main metabolites (DDTs). Genotoxicity was determined in whole peripheral blood by the single-cell
gel electrophoresis (SCGE or ‘‘comet’’) assay and by scoring erythrocytic nuclear abnormalities (ENA).
Analysis was complemented with the determination of lipid peroxidation in blood plasma by the
thiobarbituric acid reactive substances (TBARS) protocol and cell type sorting. The results showed that
exposure to contaminated sediments induced DNA fragmentation and clastogenesis. Still, laboratory
exposure to the most contaminated sediment revealed a possible antagonistic effect between metallic
and organic contaminants that might have been enhanced by increased bioavailability. The laboratory
assay caused a more pronounced increase in ENA whereas a very significant increase in DNA
fragmentation was observed in field-tested fish exposed to the reference sediment, which is likely
linked to increased lipid peroxidation that probably occurred due to impaired access to food. Influence
of natural pathogens was ruled out by unaltered leukocyte counts. The statistical integration of data
correlated lipid peroxidation with biological variables such as fish length and weight, whereas the
genotoxicity biomarkers were more correlated to sediment contamination. It was demonstrated that
laboratory and field bioassays for the risk assessment of sediment contamination may yield different
genotoxicity profiles although both provided results that are in overall accordance with sediment
contamination levels. While field assays may provide more ecologically relevant data, the multiple
environmental variables may produce sufficient background noise to mask the true effects of
contamination.
Estuarine ecological risk based on hepatic histopathological indices from laboratory and in situ tested fish
Publication . Costa, P. M.; Caeiro, Sandra; Lobo, J.; Martins, M.; Ferreira, A. M.; Caetano, Miguel; Vale, C.; DelValls, T. Ángel; Costa, Maria Helena
Juvenile Senegalese soles were exposed through 28-day laboratory and field (in situ) bioassays to sediments
from three sites of the Sado estuary (W Portugal): a reference and two contaminated by metallic
and organic contaminants. Fish were surveyed for ten hepatic histopathological alterations divided by
four distinct reaction patterns and integrated through the estimation of individual histopathological condition
indices. Fish exposed to contaminated sediments sustained more damage, with especial respect to
regressive changes like necrosis. However, differences were observed between laboratory- and fieldexposed
animals, with the latest, for instance, exhibiting more pronounced fatty degeneration and hepatocellular
eosinophilic alteration. Also, some lesions in fish exposed to the reference sediment indicate
that in both assays unaccounted variables produced experimental background noise, such as hyaline
degeneration in laboratory-exposed fish. Still, the field assays yielded results that were found to better
reflect the overall levels of contaminants and physico-chemical characteristics of the tested sediments.
Organizational Units
Description
Keywords
Contributors
Funders
Funding agency
Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia
Funding programme
SFRH
Funding Award Number
SFRH/BD/28465/2006