Loading...
Publication
A piada e a narrativa conversacional de cariz humorístico : um breve estudo comparativo
| Name: | Description: | Size: | Format: | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1.32 MB | Adobe PDF |
Authors
Advisor(s)
Abstract(s)
O Humor é uma das bases da interação social humana e, por conseguinte, uma parte
importante das relações que os indivíduos de uma sociedade estabelecem uns com os
outros, utilizando-o com as mais variadas intenções.
A presente dissertação tem como objetivo analisar nos dois subgéneros narrativos
humorísticos - a Piada e a Narrativa Conversacional de Cariz Humorístico - as
semelhanças e as diferenças na construção das suas estruturas, na utilização das
estratégias interacionais usadas pelos interlocutores durante as interações, bem como
alguns elementos avaliativos que traduzem as reações dos intervenientes perante as
narrativas ouvidas.
Na primeira parte, procedemos à referência das principais linhas teóricas que norteiam o
tema do presente trabalho. Neste âmbito, referenciamos os quadros teóricos como o de
Raskin (1985) e o de Morais (2010), tendo este último sido utilizado como ferramenta
base nas nossas análises.
Na segunda parte, analisámos Piadas e Narrativas Conversacionais de Cariz
Humorístico, uns retirados do Corpus Morais (2010), outros de um Corpus por nós
criado (Furtado (2014)).
A partir desta análise constatou-se que (i) a estrutura tanto da Piada como da Narrativa
Conversacional de Cariz Humorístico se constrói de forma muito semelhante; (ii) o
Ataque na Narrativa Conversacional de Cariz Humorístico se assemelha em muito ao
Ataque da Piada; (iii) que o modo como o locutor constrói a Orientação e a Ação na
Piada é, de um modo geral, fixo; (iv) que ambos os géneros narrativos contêm formas
de qualificação dos enunciados muito semelhantes; (v) que o trigger das Piadas opõe
sempre duas ideias distintas, conforme o preconizado por Raskin; (vi) que tanto nas
Piadas como nas Narrativas Conversacionais de Cariz Humorístico os interlocutores
necessitam de partilhar os mesmos conhecimentos prévios para que o objetivo final do
locutor seja alcançado, isto é, o riso.
Humour is one of the basis of human social interaction and therefore it is an important part of the relationships that individuals of a community establish with each other, using it with the most varied intentions. This present dissertation attempts at understanding the similarities and the differences in the construction on two humorous subgenres - the Joke and the Humourous Conversational Narratives-, analyzing their structures, the use of interactional strategies, as well as some evaluative elements that translate the reaction of the interlocutors to the heard narratives. This work is composed by two parts. In the first part, we review the literature of the main scholars who dedicated their studies to the subject of this work. In this context, there will be a reference to the theories defended by investigators as Raskin (1985), and as Morais (2010), which was used as a base tool in this study. In the second part, there will be analyzed five jokes and four Humourous Conversational Narratives, some taken from the corpus named Morais (2010), others from a created corpus called Furtado (2014). Based on these analysis it was found that (i) the structure of both the joke as the Humourous Conversational Narratives is built very similarly; (ii) the Abstract on Humourous Conversational Narratives resembles much to joke Abstract; (iii) that the way the speaker builds Orientation and Complicating Action in the joke is, in general, fixed; (iv) that both narrative genres contain forms of qualification of very similar utterances; (v) where the trigger jokes opposed two distinct ideas, as recommended by Raskin; (vi) that both Jokes and in Humourous Conversational Narratives interlocutors need to share the same prior knowledge to the ultimate goal of the speaker is reached, that is laughter.
Humour is one of the basis of human social interaction and therefore it is an important part of the relationships that individuals of a community establish with each other, using it with the most varied intentions. This present dissertation attempts at understanding the similarities and the differences in the construction on two humorous subgenres - the Joke and the Humourous Conversational Narratives-, analyzing their structures, the use of interactional strategies, as well as some evaluative elements that translate the reaction of the interlocutors to the heard narratives. This work is composed by two parts. In the first part, we review the literature of the main scholars who dedicated their studies to the subject of this work. In this context, there will be a reference to the theories defended by investigators as Raskin (1985), and as Morais (2010), which was used as a base tool in this study. In the second part, there will be analyzed five jokes and four Humourous Conversational Narratives, some taken from the corpus named Morais (2010), others from a created corpus called Furtado (2014). Based on these analysis it was found that (i) the structure of both the joke as the Humourous Conversational Narratives is built very similarly; (ii) the Abstract on Humourous Conversational Narratives resembles much to joke Abstract; (iii) that the way the speaker builds Orientation and Complicating Action in the joke is, in general, fixed; (iv) that both narrative genres contain forms of qualification of very similar utterances; (v) where the trigger jokes opposed two distinct ideas, as recommended by Raskin; (vi) that both Jokes and in Humourous Conversational Narratives interlocutors need to share the same prior knowledge to the ultimate goal of the speaker is reached, that is laughter.
Description
Keywords
Coversação narrativa Língua portuguesa Humor Piada Análise do discurso Enunciação Análise conversacional Conversational humour Joke Humourous conversational narratives Dimension analyses
Citation
Furtado, Joana Leichsenring - A piada e a narrativa conversacional de cariz humorístico : um breve estudo comparativo. [S.l.] : [s.n.], 2016. 217 p.