Logo do repositório

Percorrer por autor "DePiper, Geret"

A mostrar 1 - 2 de 2
  • Joint ICES/EUROMARINE: Workshop on common conceptual mapping methodologies (WKCCMM; Outputs from 2021 meeting)
    Publication . Afonso, Filipa; Belgrano, Andrea; Clay, Patricia; DePiper, Geret; García de Vinuesa, Alfredo; Kellner, Julie; Kenny, Andrew; Jørgensen, Lis; Lucey, Sean; Marcone, Oceane; Melkert, Renee; Mikkelsen, Nina; Olsen, Erik; Ramirez Monsalve, Paulina; Schwermer, Heike; Seixas, Sónia; Silva, Angela; Tam, Jamie; Tyrell, Abby; Valman, Matilda
    The Joint ICES/EUROMARINE Workshop on Common Conceptual Mapping Methodologies (WKCCMM) aimed to advance approaches to support inter- and transdisciplinary science via qualitative conceptual models to inform Integrated Ecosystem Assessment (IEA) throughout Eu-ropean seas and beyond. The workshop focused on developing a common understanding of conceptual mapping meth-odologies, their key uses and limitations, and processes for effective conceptual modelling with stakeholders for a variety of applications (e.g. developing food-webs, socio-ecological modelling, scoping exercises, rapid/initial management action and/or impact evaluations). Discussion in-volved presentation and discussion of a range of conceptual modelling approaches and contexts through the examination of case studies. These case studies gave rise to a suite of recommenda-tions, including the development of a workflow for IEA, and more generic guidelines and best practice advice for the use of conceptual modelling approaches with stakeholders. Although stakeholders were not able to be included in this workshop, they were very much at the heart of discussions, with the challenges and good practices of stakeholder inclusion addressed. WKCCMM also investigated how the methodologies can be best used to contribute to IEA, and may otherwise be applied throughout the ICES community, including identifying opportunities for cross-collaboration and knowledge transfer within the network.
    2022Relatório Acesso aberto Ver mais
  • Working Group on Balancing Economic, Social and Ecological Objectives in Integrated Assessments (WGBESEO; outputs from 2022 meeting)
    Publication . De Clercq, Adelbert; Goldsborough, David; Ramírez-Monsalve, Paulina; Ballesteros, Marta; Belgrano, Andrea; Delpeuch, Claire; DePiper, Geret; Fraga, Ana; Gómez Mestre, Sílvia; Goti, Leyre; Hamon, Katell; Haynie, Alan; Jaenig, Manuel; Jakobsen, Sonja; Kellne, Julie; Kotelis, Andreas; Hallin, Julie; Laksá, Unn; Lam, Mimi; Langlet, David; Jørgensen, Lis; López, Romain; Mangano, Cristina; Pedreschi, Debbi; Rice, Jake; Röckmann, Christine; Said, Alicia; Scharff-Olsen, Camilla; Schonen, Lea; Seixas, Sónia; Prieto, Marta; Stephenson, Robert; Symes, Will; van Santen, Gert; Varjopuro, Riku; Vernhout, Gerben; Ramírez-Monsalve, Paulina; De Clercq, Adelbert; Goldsborough, David
    Working Group on Balancing Economic, Social and Ecological Objectives in Integrated Assessments (WGBESEO) has two main objectives: (1) identifying objectives from legal and policy documents, and (2) understanding the implications derived from trade-offs among Economic, Social, Ecological and Institutional (ESEI) objectives. WGBESEO members are multidisciplinary professionals, including lawyers, political scientists, economists, and natural scientists, with diverse backgrounds ranging from early careers to experienced practitioners in various marine disciplines. From 2020 to 2022, WGBESEO achieved several milestones, including developing a project plan, joining integrated ecosystem assessment (IEA) groups to enhance collaboration, updating management objectives for EOs, and engaging early career researchers through traineeships and a thesis. A systematic review of peer-reviewed marine governance literature performed by WGBESEO found that little is documented on how objectives are derived from legislative mandates. A plurality of approaches was also observed: in addition to explicit management objectives found in official documents (the primary focus of the search), objectives are also derived from participatory processes like stakeholder workshops or consultations, often outside the public sphere. Most of the identified objectives relate to fisheries management, sustainability, or balancing multiple ESEI objectives. These findings were presented at ICES ASC 2021 and are being drafted into a journal manuscript. A workshop hosted by WGBESEO at the MARE 2021 conference gathered insights on factors considered by authorities when deciding on conflicting ESEI objectives. The findings revealed that authorities often face an overwhelming amount of information and considerations. Additionally, there is not a single "authority" as authorities vary in institutional levels, contextual settings, and needs to respond to different requirements, making it impossible to refer to them as a homogeneous group. Using scenarios to observe consequences is useful, but the time scales for seeing these consequences—both intended and unintended—differ for ESEI objectives, and the time scale for recovery—if recovery is possible—also varies (e.g., the possibility of rebuilding a coral reef or a fishing-dependent community). Discussions on attributes inherent to policy objectives are ongoing. Six dimensions are recognized, each set on a continuum: time, space, ambition, dimension, integration and force (obligation). WGBESEO 2025 – 2027 work continues within the framework of its two main objectives.
    2025-09-30Relatório Acesso aberto Ver mais