Alves, FátimaVidal, Diogo GuedesMeloni, MarcoSpada, Paolo2026-02-132026-02-132024-11Alves, F., Vidal, D. G., Meloni, M., & Spada, P. (com Reinsalu, K., Länts, R., Júlio, S., Sheiffer, R., Guesnon, G., Nagy, G., Ólafsson, J., Henning, B., Welling, J. T., Pinal, M. S., Fontana, C., Castro, P., Paula, A., Frazão, L., Allegretti, G., Sandri, S., Pedro, S., & Groot, M.). (2024). Deliverable D5.4 Evaluation of the pilot codisign process deliver (Deliverable Deliverable D5.4; Participation in holistic environmental / Ecological innovations, p. 219). Phoenix H2020.http://hdl.handle.net/10400.2/21281Work Package 5 (WP5) – Evaluation and Impact Assessment – aims to evaluate PHOENIX’s activity, the co-design activity, the platform, pilots and the overall applicability of the Tangram methodology. The evaluation framework will be developed with an innovative collective process that will combine academic research of secondary literature, fieldwork and a citizens’ science process in collaboration with each Territorial Commission for CoDesign (TCCD). The objective is to track 1) adherence to ethical standards and the implementation of the organisational recommendations of PHOENIX; 2) engagement (e.g. number of participants and contributions per participant); 3) The ability of different engagement strategies (e.g. random selection vs open to all) to promote inclusion of women and hard to reach populations1; 4) impact on individual attitudes (e.g. trust and efficacy); 5) impact on civic skills (e.g. civic knowledge and participatory civic skills); 6) impact on public policy; 7) usability of technological solutions; and 8) overall ability of the Tangram methodology to accelerate the European Green Deal (EGD) transition pathway. This is the fourth (D.5.4) of seven deliverables from WP5. The task was designed in accordance with the philosophy of citizen science, which promotes the democratic generation of knowledge by engaging diverse stakeholders and facilitating the exchange of expertise and insights. It establishes a co-creation process to assist PHOENIX in finalising the impact evaluation framework. This participatory evaluation activity will be done through the local knowledge and the information package developed in Task 5.1 definition of monitoring and evaluation framework. Since there is no “one-size-fits-allsolution,” the co-evaluation process will consider the pilots' context and tailor the module's design for impact evaluation to the local conditions and the specific process they will implement. The data collected and generated by Task 5.2 will contribute to updating the evaluation plan and optimising the impact evaluation instruments.engreport