Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10400.2/9434
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorMachado, Ausenda-
dc.contributor.authorFernandes, Ana Paula-
dc.contributor.authorPaixão, Eleonora-
dc.contributor.authorCaeiro, Sandra-
dc.contributor.authorDias, Carlos Matias-
dc.date.accessioned2020-03-04T19:18:07Z-
dc.date.available2020-03-04T19:18:07Z-
dc.date.issued2017-12-
dc.identifier.issn0048-9697-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10400.2/9434-
dc.description.abstractThis study's aim was to develop and implement an integrative epidemiologic cross-sectional study that allows identifying and characterising exposure pathways of populations living and working on the shores of a contaminated estuarine environment. Population residing in Carrasqueira, located on the Sado estuary with known contaminated areas was compared to another population on a noncontaminated estuary (Vila Nova de Mil Fontes -VNMF), considered a nonexposed population. Simple random samples of individuals were selected in each study population from the National Health Service Lists: 140 individuals were selected in Carrasqueira and 219 in VNMF. Participation rates were higher in the exposed group (62.5%, n = 102 in Carrasqueira and 48.3%, n =100 individuals in VNMF). The same structured questionnaire was used in both populations, including questions on occupational activities, leisure activities, consumption of food (including fish and mollusks from the estuary) and use of water for human intake and agriculture. Results showed that a significantly higher proportion of Carrasqueira participants reported doing tasks in their job that promote direct (48.8% vs 1.2% in VNMF, p-value b 0.001) or indirect (30% vs 11.9% in VNMF, pvalue = 0.004) contact with water from the estuary. Regarding seafood consumption, the exposed population of Carrasqueira had a higher frequency of consumption of cuttlefish (23.5% vs 9% in VNMF, p-value = 0.007), sole (22.5% vs 4% in VNMF, p-value b 0.001) and clams (18.6% vs 5.0 in VNMF, p-value = 0.004). The comparative study design, with exposed and nonexposed populations living on the shores of two different estuaries allowed us to confirm the hypothesis of a higher risk of contamination from the contaminated estuarine environment. The study design and the selection of both populations were adequate for this type of epidemiologic study of potential routes of human contamination in a mixture of contaminated estuarine environment and can be used in other estuarine areas with similar environmental risk.pt_PT
dc.language.isoengpt_PT
dc.rightsrestrictedAccesspt_PT
dc.subjectContaminated estuarypt_PT
dc.subjectExposure pathwaypt_PT
dc.subjectHuman exposurept_PT
dc.titleAn epidemiological approach to characterise the human exposure pathways in a contaminated estuarine environmentpt_PT
dc.typearticlept_PT
dc.date.updated2020-02-27T21:55:00Z-
dc.description.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionpt_PT
dc.identifier.slugcv-prod-533607-
degois.publication.firstPage1753pt_PT
degois.publication.lastPage1761pt_PT
degois.publication.titleScience of The Total Environmentpt_PT
dc.peerreviewedyespt_PT
degois.publication.volume601-602pt_PT
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.05.108pt_PT
rcaap.cv.cienciaid8515-398A-D241 | Sandra Sofia Ferreira da Silva Caeiro-
Appears in Collections:Ambiente e Sustentabilidade | Artigos em revistas internacionais / Papers in international journals

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Machado_et_al_2017STE.pdf743,01 kBAdobe PDFView/Open    Request a copy


FacebookTwitterDeliciousLinkedInDiggGoogle BookmarksMySpace
Formato BibTex MendeleyEndnote 

Items in Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.